Video of 'LNR Air Force' means only 1 thing: soon we will see Russian air attacks. http://t.co/Qx5buqgi2Q https://t.co/r1SduypVFT
— Ukraine@war (@DajeyPetros) January 21, 2015
@ColoradoFall One day they WILL use the airforce and they show such videos NOW to claim that AF was built from scratch. Which is nonsense.
— Ukraine@war (@DajeyPetros) January 21, 2015
Ok, so here is the FIRST mention of a 'NAF' airstrike. Likely fake. But some next time maybe not pic.twitter.com/r304ulv2YY via @patrickgjackson
— Ukraine@war (@DajeyPetros) February 2, 2015
@DajeyPetros RIA Novosti at 2148 GMT on 03 Feb 15 reported that a LPR SU-25 has struck a UKR army convoy. any further info?
— erik strandquist (@erikstrandquist) February 3, 2015
@erikstrandquist Not yet. Likely fake, to get us used to the idea they have an airforce. Which they don't. It will be Russian when they comeToday CensorNet, known to be biased very often, comes with another report:
— Ukraine@war (@DajeyPetros) February 4, 2015
CensorNet reports Russian jets attacked Ukrainian army in #Novohryhorivka http://t.co/R9fgi1QPnf pic.twitter.com/o80eYt5nWa via @Conflict_Report
— Ukraine@war (@DajeyPetros) February 9, 2015
But this time there is coming confirmation:
'Snow' means Snizhne.
CORRECTION: The 2 jets were seen over #Snizhne this weekend not today.That MAY make sense, because they will always first 'test the water'... obviously nothing bad happened, with this test flight into Ukraine and so they can go for the real attack today.
— marqs (@MarQs__) February 9, 2015
@Conflict_Report @MarQs__ "Kryvbas" Battalion Commander confirmed it too. First came 2 & then 4 from the East pic.twitter.com/pRco06wVlv
— Hetman Andrij (@HetmanAndrij) February 9, 2015
This article also reports about the airstrike:
#Statement "We need cover from air strikes. This is the second raid of the day." - Dep. Comm. of the 40th mechanized infantry batt. Lamaka
— Conflict Reporter (@Conflict_Report) February 9, 2015
More confirmation of #Russia|n Su-25 attack: https://t.co/XZJoOFdxKo pic.twitter.com/wgNG14HCvj
— marqs (@MarQs__) February 9, 2015
Now it gets interesting:
ATO spox refutes reports of #Russian aviation used near #Debaltseve http://t.co/oJTekAJ8sDYet, InterpreterMag writes:
— EuroMaidan PR (@EuromaidanPR) February 9, 2015
So it is actually REALLY WEIRD that the WEATHER is used as an argument to deny it.
The latest evaluation of all this information is this:
Two SU-25 have been seen on saterday, but no strikes have been made yet.
.@DajeyPetros UA war journo can't confirm air strikes, but his sources say they saw a couple of SU-25 over Debaltseve pic.twitter.com/25A3YX4HQi
— M.G. (@magutw) February 9, 2015
Link to facebook article.
BUT... That's HUGE anyways!!!
Now testing, next time real attack...
Another confirmation on facebook:
No comments:
Post a Comment